A person can response to a fictional article and take it as though the story in the article is REAL story. How IRONY can it be?
The same person can start making accusation about the writer based on a fictional article written by the writer. He does not know anything about the writer but pretend as though he knew everything based on reading a fictional article. How IRONY can it be?
The same person starts spinning a story using his own assumption and try to relate to how Association is run by others after reading based on a fictional article. How IRONY can it be?
I wonder does this guy did a background check on things before writing a response to a FICTIONAL story. Btw, no one will actually response to a fictional story, right? ALSO, THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THE SECRETARY IN THE FICTIONAL STORY IS THE WRITER OF THIS BLOG SITE WHICH BELONGS TO LIM TSE PIN. THIS GUY JUST ASSUME AND PERFORM CHARACTER ASSASINATION ON LIM TSE PIN. WHY IS HE PERFORMING CHARACTER ASSASINATION ON A PERSON HE HARDLY KNOW?
Anyway just to satisfy this guy who cant even spelled the writer name correctly. I would like to continue the FICTIONAL story as follows: (Do not make assumption on face value based on what to read, see, or hear from one source. Find out hard facts and then analyse it; not making assumptions/justfication to suit a propaganda. Sidenote, please have a little sense of humor when reading a fictional story. Cheers.)
The conversation did not end there as seen in the fictional story. Here is the whole conversation:
The secretary said "The key issue is the RM10/head count charged to anybody who takeover to run the event.".
The Offerer quickly suggested that the rate can be discussed aka lower rate. Then, the secretary said "It will not be fair to other Association who had paid the fee to run the event previously. I will not want my Association to be seen by others that favourism at work aka corruption in someone dictionary. If my association to take up the offer, I will insist my Association must pay the same rate as Penang".
Then, the secretary made a viable suggestion to the Offerer i.e. MCF should run the event again just like last year in Tronoh and pay whatever that is necessary to the items mentioned earlier incl. Manpower. It should breakeven with 450 pax since MCF saves on equipment.
The Offerer said "I would like someone to do it so it can take the work load from me. Also, you know last year experience is something that I would like others to experience. Maybe u can do it in your private capacity".
Then, secretary replied "Talking about work load and responsibility, then I can tell you that my Council incl. myself would not do it as we feel it is MCF duty to organise NAG, not private enterprise or any lower level chess association. On personal capacity, i would not UNDERTAKE this project because i'm a man of principle". The conversation ended there.
Many weeks later, the secretary was surprised to receive a call from another Organiser asking him to become the Chief Arbiter of NAG aka CA. The secretary declined the invitation by citing 2 reasons i.e. 1) He has many students competing, so he cannot be the CA; 2) the advance payment he made in his own capacity on behalf of MCF relate to past NAG and other matters were yet to reimburse back to him. In addition, he recommended Najib as CA. The Organiser accepted his recommendation.
The question remains "How this Organiser going to pay MCF RM10/head count" that work out to be RM4,310 Plus another RM 862 as rating fee = RM 5,172 remain to be seen.
The End of a FICTIONAL story.
P/S: Now, this article is formatted in such a way for convenient reading as opposed to the original posting made from mobile phone. For those who wish to read the 1st part of this FICTIONAL story, click here. Happy reading, remember it is a FICTIONAL story afterall.